An escalating spat over alleged sexual molestation at a therapeutic massage parlour in Chiang Mai‘s Wualai district has taken a brand new twist. The accused masseuse, together with the proprietor of the establishment, retaliated, submitting a police criticism towards the young male shopper and the creator of the Facebook submit that spurred the initial allegation. They claim the online account was a distortion of the particular occasions, causing injury to their enterprise status.
On July 7, a publish appeared on Facebook stating that a young man had been sexually assaulted by a transgender masseuse while availing of a standard Thai therapeutic massage. The client, according to the submit, took offence and responded by kicking the masseuse in the face. The publish claimed the therapeutic massage owner had refused to accept responsibility, as a substitute advising the complainant to report the matter to the police.
Proven hinged primarily on the accusation of molestation because the therapeutic massage parlour lacked CCTV cameras to supply concrete evidence. In addition, the supposed sufferer had sought injury compensation amounting to 1,000 baht (US$28). Following a media report, the incident garnered significant public consideration.
Addressing the state of affairs at present, the 38 year old masseuse Piphat and the spa owner presented themselves to the Chiang Mai City Police investigators. They lodged a report towards the web page proprietor and the young man behind the disputed Facebook story, claiming that it distorted the reality, leading to loss and injury to their popularity, reported KhaoSod.
Piphat denied the molestation allegations, explaining that the shopper had are out there in for an oil therapeutic massage together with his girlfriend waiting behind a separating curtain. Around 30 minutes into the session, the shopper all of a sudden attacked Piphat, accusing him of inappropriate behaviour, and thereafter demanding compensation of 1,000 baht. Piphat and the parlour proprietor refused to compensate as they have been convinced of no wrongdoing on their half.
The parties later met on the police station to ascertain facts and talk about a possible settlement. While the purported victim confessions about assaulting Piphat have been apparent, no evidence of latest harassment was offered. Consequently, the parties agreed to settle the assault matter with a compensation of 1,000 baht and an apology. However, the complainants reportedly proceeded to unfold distorted data on social media, contradicting their earlier settlement.
Piphat, with over six years of impeccable service in the masseuse career, vehemently denied any misconduct claims. Their initial consult with police advised moving ahead with charges of bodily harm given the opponent’s refusal to accept liability despite being at fault. They were also considering filing extra complaints for steady status damages..