A course of journey happens when the security instrumented system (SIS) places the process in its safe state by commanding an automatic valve (Figure 1) or different gear to its trip state in response to an abnormal course of condition. In some instances, a spurious trip happens because of a valve malfunction. In that case, the valve meeting is tested underneath real operating situations, which supplies a possibility to seize useful valve diagnostic knowledge.
However, such diagnostics data can solely be captured when automated valves are fitted with digital valve controllers (DVCs). In this article, we’ll talk about how DVCs can help determine the proof take a look at credit for an automated valve after a process trip.
Process journey
A process trip occurs when the SIS detects an irregular course of condition via sensors corresponding to temperature and stress, executes the logic and locations the method in its secure state by tripping the final elements corresponding to closing an automated valve, stopping a pump, etc. เครื่องมือที่ใช้วัดความดันคือ may communicate with the Basic Process Control System (BPCS) to shut a valve downstream of the automated valve as a secondary motion.
When a course of journey happens, the principle objective is often to restart the unit or tools that has been shut down as quickly as potential. Plant engineers are busy troubleshooting and correcting issues. Maintenance technicians are busy repairing broken devices. Taking the opportunity to proof take a look at an automated valve won’t be a top precedence and even an exercise under consideration because of the tight schedule after an unplanned shutdown.
Fortunately, if the automated valve is supplied with a DVC, the proof take a look at of the valve can be thought-about performed with diagnostic information captured by the DVC. Also, a comparison of the diagnostic data with the valve’s baseline can help uncover valve deficiencies and degradations that could not show up in a proof take a look at.
Figure 2. Proof Test vs Process Trip. Activities carried out (such as repairing the device) and information captured by a Fisher DVC6200 SIS digital valve controller throughout a process journey meet a lot of the 12 necessities of a proof check.
Process trips versus proof exams
How can proof check credits be claimed for an automatic valve that has failed and brought on a process trip? A proof check is a periodic check performed on SIS sensors, logic solvers and final elements — corresponding to automated valves — to find hidden failures. These failures, if not corrected or eliminated, could impair the ability of the SIS to take the process to its safe state when an irregular process condition is detected.
A proof check should be performed as per the proof take a look at interval specified in the Safety Requirement Specifications. This interval is normally determined through a mean probability of failure on demand calculation (PFDavg). Some customers may select to proof check primarily based on predetermined intervals, corresponding to proof testing sensors each 24 months and last components every 48 months as an alternative of counting on the PFDavg calculations.
Automated valve proof tests could be accomplished offline or on-line. Offline proof checks are normally scheduled throughout a turnaround, when the method is completely shut down.
Proof testing an automated valve online often requires a unit or equipment to be shut down, or the valve to be bypassed to prevent a spurious trip, making it inconvenient and costly.
But a proof take a look at may also be achieved throughout a process trip.
According to IEC61511-2 Section A.16.3.1.3, “…shutdowns as a end result of precise demand on the SIS throughout operation may be given credit as proof exams (fully or partial) under given conditions…the next planned proof take a look at could also be skipped.”
These circumstances are
The shutdown paperwork equivalent data as registered during corresponding proof check.
The shutdown covers all elements of the SIS, and if not, the gadget or SIS subsystem not activated must be examined separately.
The shutdown occurs within a predetermined maximum time window before the subsequent deliberate proof test which can then be canceled
When a process journey occurs, about 60% of a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) proof take a look at may be considered performed. A sample list of actions carried out during a proof test, along with these which would possibly be carried out during a process trip, is shown in Figure 2. Even without an automated valve leak test, knowledge captured by the DVC alone can potentially account for an excellent quantity of proof check protection for an automatic valve.
The actual coverage depends on the design of the automated valve, its DVC and its application. The protection is estimated based mostly on the valve degradations, the probability of their incidence and the percentage of these degradations that can be detected by a DVC. Fortunately, information acquired by a DVC throughout a course of journey can typically be sufficient to fulfill a major a part of the proof check requirements.
If the method trip takes place within a predetermined most time window, the end consumer may choose to leverage the process journey as a proof take a look at by completing steps one by way of 5 in Figure 2, which are often not accomplished in a course of trip. The subsequent scheduled proof take a look at can then be canceled. According to the Norwegian Oil Industry Association, the utmost time window ought to be the last half of the present proof take a look at interval.
Figure 3. Data throughout a process journey is captured by the Fisher DVC6200 SIS digital valve controller and made out there for analysis.
Common causes of valve failure
According to ISA Technical Report 96.05.01, the most likely root causes of automated valve degradations — which might result in a course of journey — embrace:
Partial or intermittent sticking of hydraulic or pneumatic system elements similar to solenoids, pilots, pace controller, and so forth., due to moisture, debris or alignment points. This causes a lack of useful margin and makes the valve slow to open or close.
Binding, galling or different degradation of valve seats or related move management trim that restricts or resists valve motion.
Actuator seal degradation caused by compression, wear or looseness that reduces the stress obtainable to actuate the valve.
Minor harm to the valve obturator plug, disk or ball caused by system circumstances, leakage or debris, including build-up of hydrocarbon products. This causes leakage.
Complete failure of hydraulic management system components similar to solenoids, pilots, speed controller, etc., because of moisture, debris or alignment. The valve will fail to open or close.
All of those situations may be detected by a Fisher DVC6200SIS digital valve controller (Figure 3).
For instance, a valve that is stuck open will exhibit itself as a rise in breakout force. Loss of seat load in comparability with when the valve meeting was new signifies potential valve leak. The Fisher DVC6200SIS also constantly displays for inner faults in addition to its inputs such as supply strain. When the DVC6200SIS sees the supply pressure is too low, an alert is generated (Figure 4) so that the top person can take corrective actions.
Figure 4. The DVC6200SIS digital valve controller detected almost zero supply pressure, so it alerted the control system.
Other process journey advantages
Diagnostic information captured throughout a course of journey may reveal valve degradations that is probably not detected throughout a proof test. For example, diagnostic knowledge captured throughout a course of trip would possibly point out a problem with the valve closing utterly towards the total strain of the process, which could be an early indication of valve leakage.
The valve stroke time computed by a DVC throughout a process journey is more accurate under actual operating conditions. This ends in a extra correct SIF response time (the time from detection of an irregular condition to final component reaching its trip state), which is in comparison with the Process Safety Time to ensure the SIF continues to be meeting its design necessities.
Although automated valves are very dependable, failures identified in a course of journey can provide useful data to forestall future failures. This information can help with turnaround planning by ensuring the wanted parts can be found earlier than turnaround even begins to probably shorten the turnaround schedule.
Summary
A course of trip can present the protection required to delay a valve’s subsequent scheduled proof check, thus saving money and time. Data captured by a DVC may be analyzed to leverage the method journey as a proof take a look at. Even if the top consumer chooses to not take proof test credit for a course of journey, the valve diagnostic information offered by the DVC can help plant personnel make proactive valve maintenance decisions..
Share