Unconditional of weapons seized by police had been destroyed in a ceremony at a Millcon Steel Company facility in Rayong this week. The destruction marks the latest effort by the Royal Thai Police to implement gun management within the nation and fight illegal firearm possession.
The national police chief Pol. Gen. Damrongsak Kittiprapas and his deputy presided over the gun destruction ceremony. Both law enforcement officials have often been personally involved with high-profile circumstances involving gun violence.
Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha has referred to as for sweeping enforcement of firearm control and elevated prevention of illegal gun possession in Thailand. But no particular recent case was talked about because the trigger for the ceremonial destruction of all the guns this week.
Various kinds of guns were destroyed during the occasion in Rayong, together with pistols, revolvers, hunting rifles, shotguns, homemade weapons and military-grade assault rifles. Some alarmingly powerful weapons were on show before their destruction including totally computerized Russian Kalashnikovs (AK) and American M16s/M4s.
The police report indicated a complete of 20,735 items were destroyed, though it’s unclear how many have been weapons versus ammunition or different weapons.
The police chief confirmed that the Royal Thai Police are addressing all features of illegal gun possession and trading. Police are working to tackle the rising downside of on-line gross sales of guns and weapons via social media.
Improper gun control in Thailand has resulted in several high-profile cases during the last year that shocked the nation and spurred requires elevated gun control enforcement.
Last week, Royal Thai Police Office commander Lt Gen Panya Pinsuk, was shot lifeless by his wife during a family argument in Bangkok. It is unclear why the police gun used was not secured.
An ex-police officer from Nong Bua Lamphu who was recognized to have problems with methamphetamine and behaviour issues killed over 30 children at an area kindergarten on October 6. At the time of the capturing, the officer was on trial for drug possession and had already been dismissed from the police pressure.
Despite this, his firearm had not been seized from him, and police by no means provided a proof for why this was the case..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *